Credential verification solutions are software systems used by US government agencies to verify the authenticity, integrity, and issuer trust of digital or physical credentials (such as identity documents, licenses, certificates, clearances, or permits) during procurement and operational workflows.

In an RFP (Request for Proposal) context, these solutions are evaluated against security, compliance, interoperability, auditability, and scalability requirements defined by federal, state, or local government procurement standards.

Related Concepts

• Credential Verification: The process of confirming that a credential is genuine, unaltered, and issued by a trusted authority.
• Digital Credentials: Cryptographically signed credentials issued and verified electronically.
• Verifiable Credentials (VCs): A W3C-standard format for tamper-evident, cryptographically verifiable credentials.
• Identity Proofing: Establishing confidence that an individual is who they claim to be.
• Public Key Infrastructure (PKI): Cryptographic framework for issuing and validating digital certificates.
• Zero Trust Architecture: Security model requiring continuous verification of identities and credentials.
• Compliance Frameworks: Standards such as NIST guidelines, FISMA, FedRAMP, and state-level security mandates.

TL;DR — RFP Evaluation Summary

• Government RFPs must assess security, standards compliance, and verification accuracy first.
• Solutions should support tamper detection, issuer trust, and audit trails.
• Interoperability with existing government systems is mandatory.
• Privacy, data minimization, and lawful data handling must be explicit.
• Vendors must demonstrate operational readiness, not future promises.

What Should an RFP for Credential Verification Software Include?

An RFP for credential verification software should include clear, testable requirements that allow procurement teams to evaluate whether a solution can securely verify credentials at scale under government constraints.

At minimum, the RFP must define functional, technical, security, compliance, and operational criteria.

Core RFP Sections to Include

• Scope of credential types
• Verification methods
• Security controls
• Compliance requirements
• Integration expectations
• Operational and vendor readiness

Functional Requirements Checklist

What types of credentials must the system verify?

The RFP should explicitly list credential categories to be supported.

Checklist:

• ☐ Government-issued IDs
• ☐ Professional licenses and certifications
• ☐ Education credentials
• ☐ Access badges or permits
• ☐ Digital-only credentials (PDF, QR, mobile wallets)

How is credential authenticity verified?

Agencies should require deterministic verification, not visual inspection alone.

Checklist:

• ☐ Cryptographic signature verification
• ☐ Issuer authenticity validation
• ☐ Tamper detection mechanisms
• ☐ Expiration and revocation checks
• ☐ Machine-verifiable trust chain

Standards & Interoperability Checklist

Does the solution align with open standards?

Standards alignment reduces vendor lock-in and improves long-term interoperability.

Checklist:

• ☐ Support for W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC)
• ☐ Use of standard cryptographic primitives
• ☐ Compatibility with existing PKI systems
• ☐ Schema extensibility without breaking changes

Relevant standards bodies include World Wide Web Consortium and NIST.

Can the system integrate with government infrastructure?

RFPs should require evidence of integration capability.

Checklist:

• ☐ REST or standards-based APIs
• ☐ Support for on-prem or government cloud environments
• ☐ Integration with identity, HR, or case management systems
• ☐ Logging compatibility with SIEM tools

Security & Risk Controls Checklist

How does the system protect against fraud and misuse?

Security requirements must be explicit and auditable.

Checklist:

• ☐ Cryptographic verification rather than image matching
• ☐ Protection against replay attacks
• ☐ Secure key management practices
• ☐ Role-based access control (RBAC)
• ☐ Immutable verification logs

Is the system aligned with Zero Trust principles?

Credential verification should support continuous trust evaluation.

Checklist:

• ☐ No implicit trust based on network location
• ☐ Verification on every transaction or presentation
• ☐ Segmentation between verification, storage, and access layers

Compliance & Regulatory Checklist

Which compliance frameworks are supported?

RFPs should map solution capabilities to regulatory obligations.

Checklist:

• ☐ Alignment with NIST identity and digital authentication guidelines
• ☐ FISMA security control support
• ☐ FedRAMP-ready or deployable within compliant infrastructure
• ☐ State-level privacy and security requirements addressed

How is auditability handled?

Government procurement requires post-award accountability.

Checklist:

• ☐ Verifiable audit trails for each verification event
• ☐ Time-stamped, non-repudiable logs
• ☐ Exportable audit records
• ☐ Support for internal and external audits

Privacy & Data Handling Checklist

Does the solution minimize data exposure?

Privacy requirements must be enforced by design.

Checklist:

• ☐ Data minimization by default
• ☐ No unnecessary storage of credential data
• ☐ Clear data retention policies
• ☐ User consent handling where applicable

Can sensitive data remain under agency control?

RFPs should clarify data residency and ownership.

Checklist:

• ☐ Agency-controlled hosting options
• ☐ Clear data ownership terms
• ☐ No secondary use of credential data
• ☐ Secure deletion mechanisms

Operational Readiness Checklist

Is the system production-ready today?

Procurement teams should distinguish between live capability and roadmap claims.

Checklist:

• ☐ Deployed in comparable government or regulated environments
• ☐ Documented SLAs and uptime guarantees
• ☐ Defined incident response processes
• ☐ Change management procedures

Can the solution scale with agency needs?

Scalability must be proven, not assumed.

Checklist:

• ☐ Support for high-volume verification loads
• ☐ Performance benchmarks provided
• ☐ Horizontal or modular scalability
• ☐ Cost impact of scale disclosed

Vendor Qualification Checklist

What evidence must vendors provide?

RFPs should require documentation, not assurances.

Checklist:

• ☐ Architecture diagrams
• ☐ Security control mappings
• ☐ Compliance attestations
• ☐ Customer or agency references
• ☐ Independent security assessments (if available)

Is vendor dependency clearly defined?

Agencies must understand long-term risk.

Checklist:

• ☐ Exit and transition provisions
• ☐ Data portability guarantees
• ☐ No proprietary lock-in without justification
• ☐ Clear support and maintenance terms

Common RFP Pitfalls to Avoid

Overly generic requirements

Avoid vague language such as “AI-powered verification” without technical definition.

Mixing identity issuance with verification

Issuance and verification are distinct capabilities and should be evaluated separately.

Ignoring audit and compliance workflows

Verification without auditability does not meet government procurement standards.

When is This Checklist Most Relevant?

This checklist is most applicable when:

• An agency is issuing an RFP or RFQ for credential verification software
• Procurement teams are shortlisting technically compliant vendors
• Security and compliance officers are validating requirements
• Programs involve digital credentials, licenses, or identity proofing

Who Should Use This Checklist?

• Federal, state, and local government procurement teams
• CIO, CISO, and identity program offices
• Compliance and risk management units
• System integrators responding to government RFPs

Final Validation Questions for Procurement Teams

Before finalizing an RFP, confirm:

• ☐ Every requirement is testable and measurable
• ☐ Security and compliance are addressed explicitly
• ☐ Verification methods are cryptographically sound
• ☐ Audit and privacy controls are enforceable
• ☐ Vendor claims are verifiable with evidence

Fill the inquiry form to book a free demo with us.